Gatchalian

Gatchalian v. Atlantic Recovery Solutions, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20243:22-cv-04108California739 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HARRIET GATCHALIAN, Case No. 3:22-cv-04108-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CLASS

9 v. NOTICE

10 ATLANTIC RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, Re: Dkt. Nos. 58, 59 LLC, et al., 11 Defendants.

12

13 Plaintiff brought this consumer class action against Defendants for abusive, deceptive, and 14 unfair debt collection practices. The Court previously granted the parties’ motion for preliminary 15 approval of a class action settlement. (Dkt. No. 57.) Plaintiff’s motion for final approval and 16 motion for attorney’s fees and costs are now pending before the Court. (Dkt. Nos. 58, 59.) 17 Having reviewed the motions and the supporting papers, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause 18 as to why she should not be required to redo the notice provided to the class given the issues 19 described below. 20 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(h)(1), “[n]otice of the motion [for attorney’s 21 fees] must be served on all parties and, for motions by class counsel, directed to class members in 22 a reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.