Ayala
Ayala v. People of California
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OIRAM ROMAN AYALA, Case No. 23-cv-04390-REL (PR) Plaintiff, v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.
A review of this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint shows that plaintiff Ayala is challenging his criminal sentence, not the conditions of confinement. Ayala invokes SB 394, codified as California Penal Code section 3051(b), which provides for parole hearings for youth offenders sentenced to life without parole (LWOP) for a crime committed before age 18 or sentenced to a determinate or indeterminate life term for a crime committed before age 26. (Compl., Dkt. No. 1 at 2-3.) He believes his LWOP sentence should “go down to a 20 year sentence” and his convictions for first degree murder should be reduced to second degree murder. (/d. at 3.) Because “habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy to attack the legality of the conviction or sentence,” the claims raised in the complaint must be raised through a habeas corpus petition. Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 933 (9th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, this civil rights lawsuit is DISMISSED without prejudice to Ayala raising…