Seth

Seth v. 22 Enterprises Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20245:22-cv-07542California178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RAJ SETH, Case NO: 5:22-cv-0 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL y DISMISSAL Re: ECF 45 22 ENTERPRISES, INC., and others, Defendants.

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

|| action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

|| Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 22 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 || Dated: March 8, 2024 h-_———— _

NATHANAEL M.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.