Walker

Walker v. Krol

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20244:15-cv-05819California1,167 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY E. WALKER, Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE RESPONSE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 62 KROL, et al., Defendants.

12 This order addresses Plaintiff’s requests for an extension of time to file the supplemental briefing ordered by the Court on July 6, 2023. Dkt. Nos. 61, 62. BACKGROUND Plaintiff commenced this action on or about December 18, 2015, over eight years ago. Dkt. No. 1. The Court found that the complaint stated certain cognizable claims and ordered service. Dkt. No. 9. On August 7, 2017, the Court dismissed the action with prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to attend his own deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) which provides district courts with the authority to dismiss an action because of a plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders or to prosecute an action; and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 35, 36. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.