Walker
Walker v. Krol
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JEFFREY E. WALKER, Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 62 10 KROL, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 13 This order addresses Plaintiff’s requests for an extension of time to file the supplemental 14 briefing ordered by the Court on July 6, 2023. Dkt. Nos. 61, 62. 15 BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiff commenced this action on or about December 18, 2015, over eight years ago. 17 Dkt. No. 1. The Court found that the complaint stated certain cognizable claims and ordered 18 service. Dkt. No. 9. On August 7, 2017, the Court dismissed the action with prejudice due to 19 Plaintiff’s failure to attend his own deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) which provides 20 district courts with the authority to dismiss an action because of a plaintiff’s failure to comply with 21 court orders or to prosecute an action; and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 35, 22 36. On…