Raimondo

Center For Biological Diversity v. Raimondo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20243:23-cv-06642California734 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL Case No. 23-cv-06642-AMO DIVERSITY, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 EXTENSION OF TIME TO LODGE v. THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 10 GINA RAIMONDO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 11 Defendants.

12 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to lodge the 14 administrative record. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments 15 and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants’ motion for the following 16 reasons. 17 Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Turtle Island Restoration Network filed a 18 complaint against Defendants Gina Raimondo and National Marine Fisheries Services (“NMFS”) 19 (collectively, “Defendants”) on December 28, 2023, alleging three causes of action: two claims 20 under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) and one claim under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 21 Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”). Compl. (ECF 1). On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.