Khan
Khan v. Madsen
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 23-cv-06141 BLF (PR)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISQUALIFY JUDGE; GRANTING
13 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
UPDATE EXHIBIT TO AMENDED
14 COMPLAINT; INSTRUCTIONS TO
CLERK
HALEY MADSEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 (Docket Nos. 12, 13) 17 18 On December 26, 2023, Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights 19 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 5. Then on December 29, 2023, 20 Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint, Dkt. No. 8, 21 which the Court granted. Dkt. No. 9. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on January 19, 22 2024, Dkt. No. 10, and then another “final updated complaint prior to screening” on 23 January 22, 2024. Dkt. No. 11. Then on February 14, 2024, Plaintiff filed an 24 administrative motion to update one of the exhibits filed in support of his amended 25 complaint. Dkt. No. 12. 26 On March 4, 2024,…