O'Connor

O'Connor v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20241:22-cv-07019California3,197 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 GILLIAN K. O.,1 Case No. 22-cv-07019-RMI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR

10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17 12 Defendant.

13 14 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying her 15 application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. See Admin. 16 Rec. at 28-36.2 Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the 17 Appeals Council (see id. at 1-6), thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the 18 Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 19 1383(c)(3). Both Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 7 & 8), and 20 both parties have moved for summary judgment (dkts. 15 & 17). For the reasons stated below, 21 Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.