Dao
Dao v. Gibbs
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20245:23-cv-05756California1,270 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CUONG HUY DAO,
Case No. 23-cv-05756 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING v. DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR
NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
C. VANHORN, et al., MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO
CLERK
Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical staff at Pelican Bay State Prison (“SVSP”) where he was previously housed. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed in a separate order. Dkt. No. 2. 22 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court…