Ma

Ma v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20244:23-cv-03301California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FABIEN HO CHING MA, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03301-JST

Petitioners,

ORDER REQUIRING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND

CONTINUING HEARING DATE

TWITTER, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 26 Respondents.

12 Before the Court is Petitioners’ motion to compel arbitration and for preliminary injunction. ECF No. 26. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs, the Court now orders supplemental briefing on the following questions: 1. Does the putative class in this case include any individuals against whom Twitter1 has successfully moved to compel arbitration in other cases? If so, how, if at all, does that impact the Court’s consideration of this motion? 2. If the Court agrees with Petitioners that they may move to compel arbitration in this district even though the arbitrations at issue were filed outside this district, must the Court compel arbitration to occur in this district notwithstanding the venue provisions of the arbitration agreements? See 9…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.