Ma

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FABIEN HO CHING MA, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03301-JST

8 Petitioners,

ORDER REQUIRING

9 v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND

CONTINUING HEARING DATE

10 TWITTER, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 26 Respondents. 11

12 13 Before the Court is Petitioners’ motion to compel arbitration and for preliminary 14 injunction. ECF No. 26. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs, the Court now orders supplemental 15 briefing on the following questions: 16 1. Does the putative class in this case include any individuals against whom Twitter1 has 17 successfully moved to compel arbitration in other cases? If so, how, if at all, does that impact the 18 Court’s consideration of this motion? 19 2. If the Court agrees with Petitioners that they may move to compel arbitration in this 20 district even though the arbitrations at issue were filed outside this district, must the Court compel 21 arbitration to occur in this district notwithstanding the venue provisions of the arbitration 22 agreements? See 9…