Kamath

Kamath v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20243:23-cv-03531California2,759 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RESHMA KAMATH, Case No. 3:23-cv-03531-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CITY AND COUNTY OF

9 v. SAN FRANCISCO’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

10 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 41 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff brings claims against the San Francisco Police Department, Federal Protective 14 Services, and the Department of Homeland Security arising out of the ticketing and towing of her 15 vehicle. The City and County of San Francisco moves to dismiss the claims against the San 16 Francisco Police Department for failure to state a claim, failure to exhaust, and failure to satisfy 17 the government claims presentation requirements. (Dkt. No. 41.1) After carefully considering the 18 parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, 19 see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the March 14, 2024 hearing, and GRANTS Defendant City and 20 County of San Francisco’s motion to dismiss. 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.