Wilson
Wilson v. Oakland Unified School District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARK A. WILSON, Case No. 3:21-cv-09157-WHO
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
9 v. DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT
10 OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 82 11 Defendants.
12 13 Plaintiff Mark Wilson brings another amended complaint against his former employer, the 14 Oakland Unified School District (“OUSD”), as well as individual Jenine Lindsey, an executive 15 director of OUSD (collectively, “the defendants”). He again alleges that he was fired from his 16 position as a school security guard for discriminatory and retaliatory reasons related to his reports 17 of unsafe and unlawful conduct by school employees. After at least four opportunities to amend 18 his complaint, including two with counsel, Wilson still fails to allege that his claims survive the 19 defendants’ judicial exhaustion, collateral estoppel, and statute of limitations arguments. The 20 defendants’ motion is therefore GRANTED, with prejudice. 21 …