Langmead
Apex.AI, Inc. v. Langmead
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 APEX.AI, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 23-cv-02230-BLF
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING MAY 2, 2024
10 v. MOTION HEARING; AND GRANTING
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
11 NEIL RICHARD LANGMEAD, an DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE individual; VERIFA, INC., a Massachusetts TO FILE COUNTERCLAIMS 12 corporation; and CODECLINIC LLC dba LATTIX, a Massachusetts limited liability [Re: ECF 73] 13 company, 14 Defendants. 15
16 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13(e), 18 seeking leave to file counterclaims that matured after Defendants filed their answer. See Defs.’ 19 Mot., ECF 73. The Court finds the motion to be suitable for decision without oral argument, and 20 therefore the hearing set for May 2, 2024 is VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 21 The motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed below. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff Apex.AI, Inc. (“Apex.AI”)…