McMillian

McMillian v. Sanofi S.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20243:23-cv-05780California3,231 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 REGINA MCMILLIAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05780-SI

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

10 SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 25 11 Defendant.

12 13 This case has been transferred to this Court from the Eastern District of Louisiana, where it 14 was part of the multi-district litigation (“MDL”) In re: Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability 15 Litigation, MDL No. 2740. Plaintiff Regina McMillian now moves for leave to file an amended 16 complaint. Dkt. No. 25. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate 17 for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for March 15, 2024. For the 18 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion. 19 20 BACKGROUND 21 This case is one of thousands filed against various defendants regarding the drug Taxotere 22 (or Docetaxel, the generic version) and its alleged links to permanent hair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.