Mitchell v. Phillip 66 Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 SHAWN MITCHELL, Case No. 23-cv-00256-LB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS
13 v. Re: ECF No. 70 14 PHILLIP 66 COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT 18 The plaintiff in this employment-discrimination case, who is representing himself, used to 19 work for the defendants (Phillip 66 and Ancon Services) as a truck driver. He claims race 20 discrimination in violation of Title VII (claim one), age discrimination in violation of the Age 21 Discrimination in Employment Act (claim two), and race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. 22 § 1981 (claim three).1 Ancon moves to dismiss counts one and two on the ground that as to 23 Ancon, the plaintiff did not properly exhaust his administrative remedies.2 24 25 26 27 1 Am. Compl. – ECF No. 22. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (ECF); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of…