AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Berkeley Lights, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20244:20-cv-08624California2,710 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABCELLERA BIOLOGICS INC, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08624-JST (VKD)

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

9 v. SERVE AMENDED INFRINGEMENT

CONTENTIONS

10 BRUKER CELLULAR ANALYSIS, INC. Re: Dkt. No. 192 Defendant. 11

12 13 In this consolidated action, plaintiffs AbCellera Biologics Inc. and The University of 14 British Columbia (collectively, “AbCellera”) allege infringement of fifteen patents.1 The asserted 15 patents are generally directed to methods that use microfluidics in cell analyses. See Dkt. No. 164. 16 Defendant Bruker Cellular Analysis (“Bruker Cellular”) now moves for an order striking 17 AbCellera’s amended infringement contentions, arguing that AbCellera’s contentions do not 18 comply with Patent L.R. 3-1. Dkt. No. 192. AbCellera opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 209. Upon 19 consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the arguments presented at the 20 February 20, 2024 hearing, the Court orders AbCellera to serve amended infringement contentions 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.