AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Berkeley Lights, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20244:20-cv-08624California3,678 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABCELLERA BIOLOGICS INC, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08624-JST (VKD)

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO STRIKE NEW ACCUSED

9 v. PRODUCTS

10 BRUKER CELLULAR ANALYSIS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 181 Defendant. 11

12 13 In this consolidated action, plaintiffs AbCellera Biologics Inc. and The University of 14 British Columbia (collectively, “AbCellera”) allege infringement of fifteen patents.1 The asserted 15 patents are generally directed to methods that use microfluidics in cell analyses. See Dkt. No. 164. 16 Defendant Bruker Cellular Analysis (“Bruker Cellular”) now moves for an order striking 26 17 accused instrumentalities in AbCellera’s amended Patent Local Rule 3-1(b) disclosures. Dkt. No. 18 181. AbCellera opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 188. Upon consideration of the moving and 19 responding papers, as well as the arguments presented at the February 20, 2024 hearing, the Court 20 grants Bruker Cellular’s motion to strike. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.