Shakya

Shakya v. Fantasia Trading LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20243:23-cv-03925California1,335 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JYOTINDRA SHAKYA, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03925-JD

10 Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v. 11

12 FANTASIA TRADING LLC, et al., Defendants. 13

14 15 Plaintiffs Jyotindra Shakya and Thanh Tran allege that defendants Fantasia Trading LLC 16 and Power Mobile Life LLC misrepresented the resolution quality of their Eufy-brand security 17 cameras to obtain a price premium. See Dkt. No. 30. Plaintiffs allege on behalf of themselves and 18 a putative class claims for fraud and unjust enrichment, and violations of California’s Consumer 19 Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 1650, et seq.), Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Profs. 20 Code § 17200, et seq.), and False Advertising Law (id. § 17500, et seq.). Id. Defendants, who 21 were served with the complaint at different times, have filed similar motions to dismiss, Dkt. 22 Nos. 43, 49, which plaintiffs oppose. Dkt. Nos. 47, 52. The motions are suitable for disposition 23 without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The parties’ familiarity with the record is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.