Larkin

Larkin v. Cabraser

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20244:24-cv-00190California3,155 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BILLY F. LARKIN, Case No. 24-cv-00190-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

REOPEN; VACATING ORDER OF

9 v. DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT;

DENYING REQUEST TO ORDER

10 ELIZABETH J. CABRASER, et al., SERVICE; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IN FORMA

11 Defendants. PAUPERIS APPLICATION SHOULD

NOT BE DENIED

12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 11, 12 13

14 15 On or about January 10, 2024, Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Nash Correctional Institution 16 in Nashville, North Carolina, filed this pro se action. Dkt. No. 1. On February 26, 2024, the 17 Court dismissed this action and entered judgment against Plaintiff because Plaintiff had neither 18 paid the filing fee nor submitted a complete in forma pauperis application. Dkt. Nos. 7, 8. 19 Plaintiff has since filed an in forma pauperis application that lacks the required supporting 20 documents – the Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Account and a copy of his prisoner trust 21 account statement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.