Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Platinum Optics Technology Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20245:20-cv-05501California6,601 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC., Case No. 20-cv-05501-EJD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

10 v.

11 PLATINUM OPTICS TECHNOLOGY Re: ECF No. 218

INC.,

12 Defendant.

13 14 In this patent infringement suit, Defendant Platinum Optics Technology (“PTOT”) requests 15 that the Court find this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285, determine to sanction Plaintiff 16 Viavi Solutions Inc. (“Viavi”) and its counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the Court’s inherent 17 power, and award PTOT $826,654 in attorneys’ fees and $8,400 in costs. Motion for Attorneys’ 18 Fees (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 218. The Court heard oral argument on October 26, 2023. 19 ECF No. 234. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral argument, the Court 20 GRANTS in part the Motion. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Viavi is a U.S.-based company that designs low angle shift optical filters using 23 hydrogenated silicon for 3D motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.