Austin v. Georgetown University

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20243:24-cv-00260California424 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-00260-DMR

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9 v.

10 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Self-represented Plaintiff George Jarvis Austin filed a complaint against Defendant 13 Georgetown University in January 2024. He filed an amended complaint on March 13, 2024 that 14 adds District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers as a defendant. [Docket No. 14 (Am. Compl.).] 15 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Georgetown University is acting “in concert with” Judge Gonzalez 16 Rogers to violate his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and 42 17 U.S.C. § 1985. Id. at 2. Austin further alleges that he “adds [Judge Gonzalez Rogers] as a 18 Defendant not for liability in the damages portion of the Demand, but simply as the Supreme 19 Court, Ninth Circuit, and California Supreme Court explicitly provides for injunctive relief to 20 prevent her ongoing negative, administrative, & discriminatory interference with Mr. Austin’s 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.