Halcrombe
Halcrombe v. Hixon
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Laron Halcrombe seeks federal habeas relief from the state court’s denial of his petitions to be resentenced under Senate Bill 567. The petition for such relief is DISMISSED because such a claim is based on state law and therefore federal habeas relief is unavailable.
BACKGROUND
According to the petition, Halcrombe was convicted in the Alameda Superior Court of attempted murder and was, in 2021, sentenced to twenty-one years in state prison. (Pet., Dkt. No. 1 at 1.) In 2023, he petitioned the state courts for resentencing under Senate Bill 567, but he was denied relief. (Id. at 3-4.) Senate Bill 567, which became effective on January 1, 2022, amended California Penal Code section 1170, in relevant part, to provide: “When a judgment of imprisonment is to be imposed and the statute specifies three possible terms, the court shall, in its sound discretion, order imposition of a sentence not to exceed the middle term, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (2).” Malone v. Gastelo, No. CV 21- 04335 JLS (RAO), 2022 WL 14966301, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022).