Munoz
Munoz v. Gipson
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1 A. Muñoz’s Eighth Amendment Claims 2 On September 16, 2021, Muñoz, a former prisoner who has since been discharged from 3 parole, filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Eighth Amendment claims 4 stemming from his previous incarcerations at KVSP and PBSP. Dkt. 1. Muñoz sues all of the 5 named defendants in their individual and official capacities. Id. at 6. He seeks the following: 6 $250,000.00 in compensatory damages and $50,000.00 in punitive damages from each defendant; 7 declaratory judgment that his federal constitutional rights have been violated; and costs. Id. at 17.3 8 1. Muñoz’s Version 9 The Court summarizes Muñoz’s allegations in his complaint by taking the following from 10 Judge Tigar’s May 12, 2022 service order: 11 Sometime in 2020, while housed at KVSP, Plaintiff submitted a 12 grievance requesting release pursuant to California Governor Newsom’s emergency order requiring defendants Diaz and Kelso to 13 release inmates who ar[e] non-violent and fit certain criteria for release under Cal. Gov’t Code § 8658. In response, on June 18, 2020, 14 a KVSP classification…