Betty's Best, Inc. v. The Facebook Advertisers Listed on Schedule A

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20243:23-cv-04716California1,603 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BETTY’S BEST, INC., Case No. 23-cv-04716-JSC

8 Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 9 OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION

THE FACEBOOK ADVERTISERS FOR STAY

10 LISTED ON SCHEDULE A, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 59 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff Betty’s Best, Inc., sues 592 Facebook Advertisers for infringement of Plaintiff’s 14 intellectual property. (Dkt. No. 1.)1 Before the Court is Certain Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, 15 in the alternative, motion for stay. (Dkt. No. 59.) Having carefully considered the briefing, the 16 Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the 17 March 21, 2024 video hearing, and GRANTS Certain Defendants’ motion to stay the action in its 18 entirety. Because the first-filed Florida Action involves substantially similar parties and issues, a 19 stay of this case will promote judicial efficiency and avoid the possibility of conflicting 20 judgments. 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.