Sequeira

Sequeira v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20244:22-cv-07996California6,735 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NELSON SEQUEIRA, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07996-HSG

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

9 v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

10 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 114 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants U.S. Department 14 of Homeland Security; U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement; Western Union Financial 15 Services, Inc.; Continental Exchange Solutions, Inc., d/b/a Ria Financial Services and AFEX 16 Money Express; Viamericas Corporation; and DolEx Dollar Express, Inc. Dkt. Nos. 63–65, 68– 17 69. The Court held a hearing on the motions. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS 18 the motions in part and DENIES the motions in part. The Court relatedly GRANTS Defendants’ 19 associated requests for judicial notice. Dkt. Nos. 66, 70,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.