Eisen

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 NOAM EISEN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05349-VKD

9 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 120-126 11 EMILY DAY, Defendant. 12

13 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 14 15 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on March 20, 2024. Dkt. No. 141. This 16 order resolves the parties’ motions in limine. See Dkt. Nos. 120-126. 17 I. EISEN MOTIONS IN LIMINE 18 A. Motion in Limine No. 1 – Supplemental Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) Disclosure 19 On March 4, 2024, the Day parties served a supplemental Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) disclosure 20 describing their damages computations. See Dkt. No. 120-1, Ex. A. The Eisen parties object to 21 this disclosure, claiming that it “include[s] multiple new categories [of damages] not otherwise 22 disclosed” on which they were unable to complete discovery. Dkt. No. 120 at 4. They ask the 23 Court to “exclude any such untimely disclosed information related to Defendant’s newly alleged 24 computation of…