Crowder
Crowder v. LinkedIn Corporation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TODD CROWDER, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00237-HSG
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART
9 v. AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS
TO SEAL
10 LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 73, 84, 85, 91 11 Defendant.
12 13 Before the Court are Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the parties’ administrative motions to 14 seal, and a non-party’s motion to seal. Dkt. Nos. 73, 84, 85, 91. The Court held a hearing on the 15 motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 77. The Court DENIES the motion to dismiss and GRANTS IN 16 PART AND DENIES IN PART the motions to seal. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiffs filed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) after the Court granted Defendant’s 19 motion to dismiss their initial complaint. See Dkt. No. 65. 20 This is an antitrust proposed class action against LinkedIn, an online social network that 21 focuses on professional connections. See FAC ¶¶ 1, 30. Plaintiffs subscribe to LinkedIn Premium 22 Career, which…