GS Holistic, LLC v. SF Hookah Palace Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-07100-JSW
8 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING, IN PART,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
9 v. ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN PART
10 SF HOOKAH PALACE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 23 Defendants. 11
12 13 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the report and recommendation 14 on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment issued by Magistrate Judge Van Keulen (the “Report”), 15 in which she recommends granting the motion in part. Plaintiff did not file objections. 16 Defendants still have not appeared in this action. The Court has considered the Report, Plaintiff’s 17 motion, and the record in this case. For the reasons that follow, the Court adopts the Report in 18 part. 19 The Court ADOPTS the Report’s analysis and conclusions on subject matter jurisdiction, 20 personal jurisdiction, and service of process. 21 The Court also ADOPTS, IN PART, the Report’s analysis and conclusions on the Eitel 22 …