Reybol

Reybol v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20243:23-cv-05546California837 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Case No. 3:23-cv-05546-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

DISMISSAL ORDER

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 11 10 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant. 11

12 Plaintiff Arcelio Jospeh Reybol, who is representing himself, filed this civil action against 13 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and paid the filing fee. (Dkt. No. 1.) Although the case was filed on 14 October 27, 2023, Mr. Reybol has not filed a proposed summons and served the summons and 15 complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4(m) (“[o]n or after filing the complaint, the plaintiff may 16 present a summons to the clerk for signature and seal” and then plaintiff is responsible for serving 17 the summons and complaint on the defendant within 90 days of filing the complaint). On 18 February 22, 2024, the Court advised Plaintiff he was required to file a proposed summons and 19 then serve Defendant with a copy of the summons and complaint. (Dkt. No. 11.) Plaintiff had 20 until March 14, 2024 to do so. To date, Plaintiff has not filed the proposed summons or otherwise 21 communicated with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.