National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress

BACKGROUND

23 The parties are intimately familiar with the long, unusually complex litigation background 24

25 1 Defendants are the Center For Medical Progress (“CMP”), Biomax Procurement Services LLC (Biomax”), and David Daleiden. Defendant Troy Newman was dismissed from this case by 26 stipulation of NAF and Newman, and over the objections of CMP, Biomax and Daleiden. Dkt. No. 653. 27 1 of this case. That background is briefly summarized here. 2 In July 2015, reaffirmed in August 2015, I entered a Temporary Restraining Order 3 (“TRO”) that prevented defendants from:

4 (1) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party any video, audio, photographic, or other recordings taken, or any confidential 5 information learned, at any NAF annual meetings;

6 (2) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party the dates or locations of any future NAF meetings; 7 (3) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party the names or 8 addresses of any NAF members learned at any NAF annual meetings; and 9 (4) attempting to gain access to any future NAF meetings. 10 Dkt. Nos. 15, 27. The TRO remained in place, as…