Steiner

Steiner v. Vi-Jon Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20243:23-cv-00473California4,807 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIELLE STEINER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00473-AMO

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 VI-JON INC, Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendant. 11

12 13 This is a case about hand sanitizer labeling. Defendant Vi-Jon, Inc.’s motion to dismiss 14 was heard before this Court on October 12, 2023. Having read the papers filed by the parties and 15 carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant 16 legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss, for the following 17 reasons. 18 BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff Danielle Steiner and Plaintiff Amnery Castaneda purchased Vi-Jon’s “Germ-X® 20 moisturizing original hand sanitizer” (“Product”) in Orange County. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 29-32. 21 Defendant Vi-Jon, LLC (incorrectly sued as Vi-Jon, Inc.) (“Vi-Jon”) is a Missouri corporation 22 headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, that manufactures and distributes the Product…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.