VOX Network Solutions, Inc. v. Gage Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VOX NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No. 22-cv-09135-AMO Plaintiff, 8
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
9 v. AND DENYING IN PART
MOTION TO DISMISS
10 GAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants. 11 12 13 This is a case about trade secret misappropriation. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion 14 to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil 15 L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the 16 relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the 17 motion to dismiss for the following reasons. 18 I. BACKGROUND1 19 Plaintiff Vox Network Solutions, Inc. (“Vox”) and Defendant Gage Technologies, Inc. 20 (“Gage”) are companies that provide consulting and network support services. Compl. ¶¶ 2, 5. In 21 late 2017, Vox hired Defendant Kristopher McGreevey as a Regional Sales Director for the 22 Pacific Northwest, and Defendant Kevin Frazier as a Senior Account…