San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20245:20-cv-00824California4,033 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Lead Case No. 20-cv-00824-EJD Consolidated Case No. 20-cv-00826-EJD 9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

10 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AWARD

OF INTERIM ATTORNEY’S FEES

11 CITY OF SUNNYVALE, et al., AND COSTS; REQUIRING

PROVISION OF UNDERLYING

12 Defendants. BILLING RECORDS

13 Re: ECF No. 200 14

15 Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Plaintiff” or “Baykeeper”) brings this suit against 16 Defendants City of Sunnyvale and City of Mountain View (together, “Defendants” or the “Cities”) 17 under the citizen suit enforcement provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the 18 “Clean Water Act” or the “Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq., alleging that the Cities have 19 unlawfully discharged bacteria pollution from their municipal storm sewer systems into the San 20 Francisco Bay and its tributaries. See Second Am. Compl. (“Sunnyvale SAC”), ECF No. 140; 21 Second Am. Compl. (“Mountain View SAC,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.