Spectrum Scientifics, LLC v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20245:20-cv-03642California4,126 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SIGURD MURPHY, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-03642-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

10 v. ATTORNEYS' FEES 11 CELESTRON ACQUISITION, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 508 Defendants. 12 13 Defendants, Synta Technology Corp. of Taiwan, Suzhou Synta Optical Technology Co., 14 Nantong Schmidt Opt-Electrical Technology Co. Ltd., Synta Canada International Enterprises Ltd., 15 Pacific Telescope Corp., Olivon Manufacturing Co. Ltd., SW Technology Corp., Celestron 16 Acquisition, LLC, Olivon USA LLC, David Shen, Joseph Lupica, and David Anderson 17 (collectively, “Defendants”), filed the present motion for attorneys’ fees following the Court’s 18 award of sanctions against Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”). Mot., ECF No. 508. Plaintiffs 19 filed an opposition, and Defendants filed a reply. Opp’n, ECF No. 519; Reply, ECF No. 530. 20 Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.