Faizi

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL 9 FLAME, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 95 12 BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Defendants. 13 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for 16 Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” seeking relief for himself and on behalf of nominal 17 defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame” or “Company”), against two of Falafel Flame’s 18 directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including 19 allegedly unauthorized Falafel Flame restaurants. See Dkt. No. 1. Most of the parties’ litigation 20 efforts have focused on four allegedly unapproved Falafel Flame establishments in Hayward, 21 Sunnyvale, San Jose, and Upland, California (“Unapproved Falafel Defendants”). See id. ¶ 15; 22 see…