Velazquez

Velazquez v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20241:22-cv-05522California2,148 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 JACOB I. V.1, Case No. 22-cv-05522-RMI

9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 10 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR 11 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, REMAND 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 24

13 14 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying his 15 application for disability insurance benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. See 16 Admin. Rec. at 1.2 The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) declined 17 to review the ALJ’s decision. Id. As such, the ALJ’s decision is a “final decision” of the 18 Commissioner of Social Security, appropriately reviewable by this court. See 42 U.S.C. §405(g), 19 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. (Dkts. 8, 10). 20 Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment (dkt. 15) and Defendant has moved for remand for 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.