Yates

Yates v. Sonoma County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20244:23-cv-01812California5,967 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ZACHARY YATES, Case No. 23-cv-01812-HSG

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

10 SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 25 Defendants. 11

12 13 Pending before the Court are the County Defendants’1 and Legacy Long Distance 14 International’s motions to dismiss. See Dkt. Nos. 11, 25. The Court finds these matters 15 appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil 16 L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN 17 PART Defendants’ motions to dismiss. 18 I. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 19 In support of their motion to dismiss, the County Defendants filed a request for judicial 20 notice regarding, inter alia, court records associated with Plaintiff’s underlying criminal matters as 21 well as administrative jail records. See Dkt. Nos. 12–13. Legacy joins in this request. See Dkt. 22 No. 25 at 10–11.2 Plaintiff opposes the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.