Bold Limited v. Rocket Resume, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 BOLD LIMITED, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01045-BLF
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER REGARDING SEALING
9 v. MOTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
10 ROCKET RESUME, INC., et al., JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO
PRECLUDE DAMAGES THEORY
11 Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 201, 202, 206, 209, 210, 217, 12 218] 13 Before the Court are the parties’ sealing motions in connection with Defendants Rocket 14 Resume, Inc., and Stephen Zimmerman’s motion for summary judgment and motion to preclude 15 damages theory. ECF Nos. 201, 202, 206, 209, 210, 217, and 218. The Court has considered the 16 motions, and its rulings are laid out below. 17
I. LEGAL STANDARD
18 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 19 and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 20 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 21 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). …