Rabin, CPA v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20245:22-cv-04547California1,900 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEVE RABIN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04547-PCP

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 63 10 GOOGLE LLC, Defendant. 11

12 13 In this putative consumer class action, plaintiffs allege that Google lured them into using 14 its suite of business productivity tools by promising free access for as long as the tools were 15 available but broke this promise when it began charging them for the tools after plaintiffs had used 16 them for years. The Court previously dismissed plaintiffs’ first amended complaint with leave to 17 amend the breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and California Unfair Competition Law claims. 18 Plaintiffs then filed a second amended complaint, which Google has again moved to dismissed. 19 The Court assumes familiarity with the previous order, Dkt. No. 54, 2023 WL 4053804, 20 and applies the same standard in resolving Google’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). There 21 are three claims in the latest complaint: (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of the implied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.