Rakofsky

Rakofsky v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20245:22-cv-04427California6,917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, Case No. 22-cv-04427-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

v.

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Re: ECF No. 36 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Joseph Rakofsky (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”), Daimler Aktiengesellschaft, Mercedes-Benz of Monterey (“Monterey MB”), Wienik Bleyenberg, Devon Thompson, and Does 1 to 10 (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff brings various claims related to Defendants’ work on Plaintiff’s 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML350 BlueTEC. Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, Mercedes-Benz USA’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Allegations Unless otherwise specified, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.