Hale

Hale v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20243:23-cv-00700California11,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 P.H., Case No. 23-cv-00700-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING CROSS-

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 17 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff P.H.1 challenges the final decision of Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner),2 finding P.H. eligible for disability benefits beginning only on August 28, 2018 rather than her alleged onset date of January 1, 2014. The parties filed cross- motions for summary judgment under Civil Local Rule 16-5. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS P.H.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. 13), DENIES the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. 17), and REMANDS for further proceedings.3 II. BACKGROUND A. Personal and Medical History This section summarizes the portions of the Administrative Record relevant to the parties’ arguments and the outcome of this Order, and is not a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.