Doe

Doe v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20243:23-cv-02865California6,525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02865-EMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., et al., Docket No. 82 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs are seven individuals. All are proceeding anonymously: John Doe, John Doe II, Jane Doe, Jane Doe II, Jane Doe III, Jane Doe IV, and Jane Doe V. Plaintiffs have sued three Kaiser entities: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (“KFHP”); Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (“Kaiser Hospitals”); and The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (“TPMG”). The three entities shall be referred to collectively as “Kaiser.” According to Plaintiffs, Kaiser installed code from six different third parties on its website and two mobile applications (i.e., the Kaiser Permanente App and the Kaiser Permanente Washington App), and that code allows the third parties “to intercept the content of [a website/app user’s] patient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.