Marani
Marani v. Cramer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division KEVIN MARANI, Case No. 19-cv-05538-YGR (LB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. Re: ECF No. 180 MICHAEL CRAMER, et al., Defendants. 16 The plaintiff, Kevin Marani, alleges that the eleven defendants perpetrated “a sophisticated international investment fraud and money laundering scheme against [him].”1 The plaintiff lives in California and the defendants mostly live in Canada.2 Defendant Michael Cramer, who is representing himself, has infrequently participated in the case. Twice before, he has been ordered to respond to the plaintiff’s first set of written discovery.3 After that, the plaintiff served a second set of written discovery. Mr. Cramer has responded to both sets but the plaintiff contends that the responses are deficient. After attempting to confer but receiving no response, the plaintiff now moves (1) to compel discovery from Mr. Cramer, (2) to amend the scheduling order to