IN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 IN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION CASE NO. 4:21-CV-00913-YGR

7 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 210, 233, 245

11

13 Nine plaintiffs, namely Sarah Brown, Josh Crawford, Jessica David, Autumn Ellison, 14 Ludmila Gulkarov, Vanessa Mathiesen, Kelly McKeon, Tommy Nurre, and Janine Torrence, sue 15 defendant Plum, PBC on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of baby food products sold under 16 the “Plum Organics” brand. Plaintiffs allege that they were deceived because defendant’s 17 labeling did not disclose that levels of certain heavy metals and perchlorate may exist in those 18 products as a result of their ingredients. Defendant Plum, PBC brings the instant motion for 19 summary judgment. 20 Fourteen claims remain in this action, eleven based in state statutes and three in common 21 law. Thus, plaintiffs allege statutory violations of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act 22 (“CLRA”), California Civil Code §§1750,…