Harper

Harper v. Trumbull

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20244:23-cv-02623California1,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL ALLEN HARPER, Case No. 23-cv-02623-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

v. JUDGMENT

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL, Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Paul Harper’s motion to alter or amend the judgment previously entered in this case. Dkt. No. 61. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2024, the Court granted the late Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint on judicial immunity grounds. Dkt. No. 55. Following that order, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of Judge Trumbull against Plaintiff Harper and closed the case. Dkt. No. 56. A few weeks later, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default, Dkt. No. 57, which the Clerk declined to enter, Dkt. No. 58. On March 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend judgment, citing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.