Seti

Seti v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-00289California8,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TA SETI, Case No. 23-cv-00289-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JIM ROBERTSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without attorney representation, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”). The amended complaint (ECF No. 18) is the operative complaint. The remaining claims are against the following PBSP officials: Warden Jim Robertson, Sergeant Silva, Chief Deputy Warden R. Bell, and Associate Wardens K. Osborne, A. Pepiot, D. Barneburg, C. Parry, and T. Lemos (“Defendants”)1. (See ECF No. 17.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff filed an opposition, and Defendants replied. (ECF Nos. 27, 37, 38.) For the reasons discussed below, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.