DFND Security, Inc. v. CrowdStrike, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:22-cv-04542California1,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DFND SECURITY, INC., Case No. 22-cv-04542-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

CROWDSTRIKE, INC., et al., SEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 46,

12 Before the Court are two administrative motions to seal documents and exhibits: DFND Security, Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed (ECF 46) and CrowdStrike, Inc.’s Unopposed Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (ECF 51). The Court, having carefully considered the submissions, the record, the applicable law, and any arguments related thereto, hereby orders that the motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. A. Legal Standard “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’ ” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.