Pulido

Pulido v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20245:22-cv-05830California9,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 E.P., Case No. 22-cv-05830-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 19 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff E.P. appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)1 denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, et seq. E.P. contends that the ALJ (1) did not properly evaluate certain medical opinions, (2) failed to provide sufficient reasons for discounting her allegations of mental dysfunction, and (3) erred in concluding that she can perform past relevant work as a dry cleaner helper and animal caretaker, and therefore is not disabled. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 17, 19, 20. The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.