Arocha

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY AROCHA,

Case No. 23-cv-01733-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH CDCR, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND 7 Defendants.

9 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s allegations in his first amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint are prolix and confusing. Accordingly, the first amended complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file a second amended complaint on or before May 1, 2024. Failure to file a proper amended complaint by May 1, 2024, or a failure to comply in every respect with the instructions given in this order, will result in the dismissal of this suit and the entry of judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 16.) His motion to waive court fees is DENIED as moot because his application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. (Dkt. No. 15.) DISCUSSION A. …