Attia

Attia v. Oura Ring, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20244:23-cv-03433California3,856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER ATTIA, Case No. 23-cv-03433-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION AND TO DISMISS OR,

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY

OURA RING, INC., et al., PROCEEDINGS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendants Ouraring, Inc. and Oura Health Ltd. Dkt. No. 16. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. I. BACKGROUND On July 10, 2023, Plaintiff Peter Attia filed a complaint against Ouraring. Inc. (“Oura”) and Oura Health Oy (“Oura Oy”) (collectively, “Defendants”) based on Defendants’ alleged failure to compensate him for advisory work he performed for the companies. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.