Castillo

Castillo v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20243:23-cv-06448California2,760 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division GILBERT CASTILLO, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06448-LB

Plaintiffs,

SCREENING ORDER

v. Re: ECF No. 1 SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, who represents himself and is proceeding in forma pauperis, sued the San Ramon Valley Unified School District and its employee Nadia Rosenzweig for excluding his two sons from kindergarten on the ground that they had not obtained the vaccinations required for enrollment.1 Before authorizing the U.S. Marshal to serve the complaint, the court must screen it for minimal legal viability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The deficiencies in the complaint are that the plaintiff has not plausibly pleaded a federal claim and has not demonstrated that the court has diversity jurisdiction. He may submit an amended 25 26 27 1 complaint by April 24, 2024, if he can cure the deficiencies identified in this order. If he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.